Published files

Where the person under investigation holds a public office, the file, the decision and the reasons are published on the conclusion of the case.

Article 226(3): where the person under investigation holds a public office, the file, the decision and the reasons are published upon the conclusion of the case.

Source

PS-2026-118

Lindoma Yards, falsified cutting records

Source: Audit Office, transmitted on audit
Matter: Falsification of a physical account, Article 100(5)
Note: The person under investigation holds a management organ of an enterprise. The file, the decision and the reasons will be published on the conclusion of the case under Article 226(3).

Under investigation

PS-2026-094

Undeclared interest of a planning delegate

Source: Office of Democratic Integrity, transmitted on referral
Matter: Concealed interest in a matter before a planning body
Note: The person under investigation holds a public office, so the file will be published on conclusion.

Under investigation

PS-2026-071

Preference in allocation, executive committee

Source: Office of Democratic Integrity, transmitted on referral
Matter: Preference prohibited by Article 113(3)
Note: Referred to the Constitutional Court in parallel. The two proceedings are independent.

Under investigation

PS-2025-233

Appropriation of resources, communal building service

Source: Office of Democratic Integrity
Matter: Appropriation of public resources
Note: Declined for want of evidence that the resources left the purposes of the plan. The injured commune was notified with the reasons, and the decision is reviewable by a court at its instance under Article 226(2).

Prosecution declined

PS-2025-190

Concealment of a physical account

Source: Audit Office, audit A-2025-014
Matter: Concealment of a physical account, Article 100(5)
Note: Declined. Reasons published. Reviewable at the instance of the injured person.

Prosecution declined

PS-2025-142

Refusal to furnish records to an oversight office

Source: Audit Office
Matter: Refusal to furnish what an office requires, Article 241(3)
Note: The person held a delegated function. The file, the decision and the reasons were published on the conclusion of the case under Article 226(3).

Concluded, convicted

Files declined

Two files above were declined. The injured person is notified, the decision states the reasons, and it is reviewable by a court at the instance of that person. Both decisions stand published with their reasons, and both remain open to review.

Contents and timing of publication

Stage	What is public
Transmission from an oversight office	The fact of transmission, published by the office transmitting it under Article 242(1)
Investigation	Nothing, until a decision is taken
Decision not to prosecute	The decision and the reasons, notified to the injured person
Conclusion of a case concerning a public office holder	The file, the decision and the reasons
Annually	Aggregate reporting of investigations touching office holders