On the far right in Europe

Published by the Humanist Socialist Party for the first Assembly election, and reproduced here in full

This is a document of the Humanist Socialist Party, reproduced here in full. The register publishes it because the party page refers to it, and the register adopts none of it. Political pluralism is guaranteed by Article 12(1), and Article 12(4) forbids any administrative authority to classify a political association by its ideology.

Four reasons of principle

The history of the Republic
A Directorate governed here for twenty years without publishing its plans. The party drew from that period the position it later wrote into Resolution 61 of 2026: a record built around named persons produces a figure to be honoured and a figure to be blamed, and a state able to produce the second is able to produce the first.

The party describes the far right as politics organised around a single such figure. A rule applied to the record of the Republic would be worth nothing if the party accepted that form of politics abroad.
The composition of the far-right vote
In every European state where such a party has grown, part of that growth has come from industrial and low-paid workers who previously voted for socialist and social democratic lists. The party states that those voters were lost by parties that stopped delivering provision.

Its answer has two halves: provision delivered and measured at home, and direct opposition to the parties that now hold those votes.
The content of far-right programmes
They attack equality on grounds of sex and gender, the secularity of the state, and decision over one's own body. In the Republic those three subjects are Article 38(2), Article 11 and Article 46(3), and Article 310 places each of them beyond the amending power. Every European government formed on the opposite position reduces the number of states with which the Republic shares that settlement.
The people such governments reach first
Migrants, minorities and the stateless. Residents of Iosmein enter, remain, work, study and receive care here on the footing of residents of the Republic under Article 296(2). Governments of the far right close frontiers as a matter of programme, and each closure reduces what the standing objective of Article 296 can achieve.

Two reasons of interest

Ukraine, and the division over Russia
The European far right is divided. Several of its parties oppose the supply of arms to Ukraine and propose the lifting of sanctions. Others support Ukraine and the Atlantic alliance. The party supports Ukraine and works with none of the first group.

It cites the Hungarian change of government of May 2026, after which that state withdrew its veto of the Union loan to Ukraine, as a case for treating the composition of a government as a thing that decides the outcome.
The licences and the safeguards conditions
The Republic sells uranium concentrate, fuel assemblies and specialised components into the Union under licences that each have a safeguards condition attached. A government that repudiates those conditions, or that attaches political conditions of its own, ends the trade, and the loss falls on provision. The Republic has no large army and no alternative buyer within reach of a usable port.

What the party examined

The party reviewed the video material published by the sovereigntist movement in Romania over the elections of 2024 and 2025 and since. It reached the same conclusion as the independent Romanian press, the fact-checking organisations, and the streamers who examine the material publicly, among them being Silviu Faiăr: most of it is of low quality and a large part of it is false.

Alongside the anti-Union and pro-sovereignty themes, which one study puts at about a third of the inauthentic content, the same accounts and the same production methods sell miracle cures. In May 2026 the Romanian prosecuting authority dismantled a network that had operated since 2019, selling supplements by advertisements built on altered images of doctors and public figures and promising recovery from hypertension, diabetes, obesity and cancer.

The party sets out four findings from published studies.

Sovereigntist parties hold about thirty-five per cent of the seats in the Romanian parliament.
Seventy-six per cent of the disinformation circulating on the platform in that country is generated by ten accounts.
Between twenty and forty-two per cent of the videos published by seven members of the European Parliament elected on two sovereigntist lists were assessed as toxic.
Romania stands second from last in the Union for media literacy, and its independent press sector is strong and underfunded.

The conclusion the party draws is that the movement is a distribution system before it is a political programme, that the same system carries the political claim and the fraudulent one, and that a voter who has bought the second is being trained to accept the first.

"The pills and the politics come from the same ten accounts. A person who has been sold a cure for diabetes has been taught that a stranger on a screen knows more than a doctor. The vote follows the pill. It is why this is a health question and a democratic question at once, and why we treat it as both."
Humanist Socialist Party, Guide on fighting extremism, section 3

What the party proposes

The Republic may not act against a party by classification. Article 265 makes classification by ideology void in every case, Article 12(4) forbids it to any administrative authority, and Article 12(3) leaves dissolution to the Constitutional Court upon proof of specified acts. The party asked for those limits and records that they bind the party itself.

Both the National Traditionalists and Shelter and Provision were classified under the safeguard power of 2024. The party has undertaken never to propose the return of that power under another name.

Four measures follow, none of which touches the content of any opinion. Article 53 guarantees expression and prohibits censorship, and the party states that its measures are to be read against that article.

The first is that the annual report of the Office of Democratic Integrity under Article 261 state, in figures, the concentration of media ownership and the reach of the largest accounts. The second is that media literacy be taught as a subject in the schools, on the ground that the Republic performs well on this measure and its neighbours do not.

The third is that every claim made against a group be answered by publishing the measurement, which is the undertaking against tension the party gave in the joint standing decision of 3 February 2026. The fourth is that the party answer false material about health with the same procedure it uses for false material about politics.

"The far right in Europe is one movement with local names. We oppose it in every state where we have a partner willing to oppose it, and we oppose it here by argument and by figures, because the Constitution forbids us to oppose it by classification and we asked for that prohibition ourselves. A party we may not ban is a party we must out-argue."
Humanist Socialist Party, Guide on fighting extremism, section 5

Article 11 Article 12(3)Article 38(2)Article 46(3)Article 53 Article 261 Article 265 Article 296 Article 310