Parties outside parliament

All three argue that the established left has entrenched itself. Each of the three supported the Constitution at the referendum, and none of them objects to a particular article.

The objection concerns three decisions taken alongside the text: four parties holding seventy-nine of a hundred seats registered a joint standing decision on 3 February 2026, obtained a resolution of the chamber instructing the Office of Democratic Integrity to report against it, and then adopted Resolution 61 on the naming of persons in the record. Every step was lawful and every step was taken by the same four parties.

The answer the four give is that the decisions bind only the signatories, create no power, and are drafted against themselves. The answer the three give is that a commitment which creates no power also creates no remedy, and that the safeguard power of 2024 showed what an undertaking without a penalty produces.

0.21% of the vote in 2025no seatROT

Wants a limit of two consecutive terms on any member of the Assembly, mandatory rotation of committee chairs, and a proportion of the chamber drawn by lot from the residents alongside the elected members. It notes that Article 128 gives the residents of a district the power to remove the member they elected, and that the power has been used four times since 1974 in organic law, in each case in a single district.

Article 128Article 129

0.14% of the vote in 2025no seatOR

Wants the standing decisions of the parties brought under the publication duty of Article 12(2) and reported on by the Office of Democratic Integrity. Its case is that the joint standing decision of 3 February 2026 was made by four parties holding seventy-nine of a hundred seats, that it commits them on the substance of Titles II, III and X, and that it appears in no law and answers to no organ.

Article 12(2)Article 259Article 261

0.09% of the vote in 2025no seatCF

Wants the transitional implementation handed to the communes wherever Article 167 allows it. It states that most measures adopted in the first year after commencement were prepared by central bodies, and that a practice established in that year will be followed in later years.

Article 167Article 169Article 332

The projection for the first Assembly puts the lists winning no seat at 0.4 per cent between them, below the quotient at which the two hundredth seat is won. This is an uncertain assumption in the projection and none of the three has contested an election in a chamber of two hundred, where a seat is won on about half the share a seat required in 2025. If one of them reaches a quarter of one per cent, it takes a seat from the ninth party. See the projection.