Republic of Fluid Public Register · Office of Constitutional Revision

Register › Assembly › Parties › DS

Democratic Socialists

The party of the Assembly Reform of 1974, and the one that voted against Resolution 61

Democratic SocialistsDS

15 seatsof 10014.7% of the voteLeft to radical left

Democratic socialism, Marxism, syndicalism

Formed in the 1920s from the Agrarian and Youth parties. The largest force behind the Assembly Reform of 1974. It signed the joint standing decision of 3 February 2026 and then voted against Resolution 61 of 14 May, which the same decision had announced.

Ideology

The party holds that the working class is the agent of social change and that a socialist order is established by the organised action of that class through elections, workplaces and unions. Its Marxism is analytical and it uses the term of itself: it explains distribution by the ownership of productive assets and treats the constitutional settlement of Article 6 as the resolution of that question.

Its syndicalism gives the workplace a standing of its own. The party holds that the enterprise assembly is a constitutional body and not an internal arrangement, and that the powers of the assembly under Title IV should grow as the planning system matures.

Position on the Constitution

The party supported the draft and campaigned for it.

Its dispute is with the informal commitments made alongside it. It held in the chamber that a responsibility recorded without a name is not a responsibility assumed, and that the Cortius Report can be read only because it states which officials received it and did not publish it.

Programme

Membership from the shop floor

Article 85(1) makes every worker a member of the enterprise after a probation of at most six months. The party wants that probation shortened by organic law and the register of enterprises audited against it, on the ground that a long probation would produce a class of workers employed in an enterprise without membership of it.

Article 85(1)Article 88(2)

The plan opened up

The negotiated cycle of Article 97 publishes balances, variants and assumptions. The party wants the Planning Secretariat to publish its methods and its source code alongside them, which Article 109(5) already requires of public bodies.

It also wants each dissenting position recorded in the register of decisions to be published in the same document as the decision it opposes.

Article 97Article 109(5)

Shorter hours as the first use of a surplus

Article 72 governs working time and rest, and Article 100(4) sends surpluses from technical improvement into the ceiling of the following period. The party wants a stated share of each such surplus taken as a reduction in hours, with the share fixed in the plan itself and settled by no later negotiation.

Article 72Article 100(4)

Names on the record

The party accepts Resolution 61 as adopted and continues to argue against it. Its position is that paragraph 3, which sends necessary names to the annexes, should be read carefully, and that each annex should be linked from every paragraph it supports, which the Office of Constitutional Revision has undertaken to do.

"A state that cannot name the official who withheld the Cortius Report cannot say it has learned anything from it. We accepted the vote but we will keep asking who."

Democratic Socialists, Statement in the chamber, 14 May 2026

Article 315Article 316

Relations outside the Republic

The party maintains some contact with left parties abroad and seeks no formal affiliation, holding that affiliation to a Union party family would commit it on Union questions that the Republic has no standing to decide. It supports Ukraine, opposes the parties of the far right in Europe, and takes no position favourable to Russia.

Public opinion

The figures below come from the quarterly survey published by communal press at Lindoma. They have no official standing, and the Electoral Commission publishes no survey of its own.

Thirty-eight per cent of respondents describe the party favourably and 34 per cent unfavourably. Its support is strongest in Leriduson, Esteveduson and Quintorum, and among members of the industrial cooperatives, where it leads every other list.

Its opposition to Resolution 61 is supported by 36 per cent of respondents and opposed by 48 per cent, and the party runs ahead of its national share among the first group. The projection treats the two movements as close to cancelling.

Officers and candidates

The names below are published under paragraph 3 of Resolution 61 of 2026, which sends an individual name to the annexes where it is necessary to establish a fact. Who stands for election is such a fact, and a voter cannot exercise the preference Article 120(5) gives without it. Naming candidates and party officers is therefore consistent with the depersonalisation of the official record, which reaches decisions of state and the persons who took them. The annex explains the rule and this exception.